Comment

Entrepreneurial women are being snubbed by investors

We must act now to ensure female founders get the money needed to grow their companies

Getting more funding to female entrepreneurs means making significant change. Institutions and individuals must make different decisions. Women need better representation on the investment committees where many of those decisions are made. Female entrepreneurs, meanwhile, need more support.

When we published the Rose Review of Female Entrepreneurship back in 2019, we understood the scale of this challenge, but we also knew that greater transparency about funding could drive progress. 

The result was the Investing in Women Code, a Government-backed scheme which commits members to reporting data about their support for female-led businesses, improving the potential for female entrepreneurs to succeed and making sure a senior leader takes responsibility for supporting equality. It was designed to help deliver the £250bn of new value that would be created for the UK economy if women started and scaled their businesses at the same rate as men.

We know a record number of women are starting businesses, and the proportion of companies created by young women is growing faster than any other age group. Now, we need to make sure they can access the investment they need to realise their ambitions.

The Code’s annual report, published today, shows 160 institutions have now signed up, including four of the “big six” banks; Britain’s largest building society; 30 angel syndicates; and over 100 venture capital and growth capital firms. All of them are choosing to take action, report and reflect on their progress.

Data submitted by code signatories to the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy shows that progress is being made. Last year, the average amount of angel funding sought by all female teams almost matched the amount asked for by men. That was a big jump forward from 2020, when female entrepreneurs requested less than half as much as their male counterparts

In venture capital and growth finance, the percentage of funding going to all-women teams also rose and the number of venture capital firms committing to the code was almost 50pc higher than the previous year.

But this data also highlights where more change needs to come and it tells a clear story. Across investors and lenders, female-led businesses consistently seek and receive less investment and lending than firms run by men.

Together, we have to change this and work is underway. The Women Angel Investment Taskforce is taking a newly launched ‘Women Backing Women’ campaign around the country, working with local organisations and groups to make angel investment more understandable and accessible for women. Emma Davies, the co-chief executive of Octopus Ventures, has joined the Rose Review board to drive new thinking among venture capitalists. We are busy recruiting more companies to commit to the code.

Above all, we know what makes a difference. Today’s report shows how important it is to ensure that female entrepreneurs can make “warm” approaches to investors. Cold approaches – applications for investment without referrals from parties known or trusted by investors – are much more likely to fail. We need to build the networking opportunities that allow women to create relationships that lead to funding.

We know, too, that signatories to the code can create change. For example, venture capital code signatories are more likely to invest in companies with a female founder than the wider market. Yes – companies with a greater existing commitment to equality are natural backers of the code, but many signatories are active in asking the questions that matter: how can we be accessible for female founders, more imaginative in where we look for investments, and fairer in the decisions we make?

Some of the answers to those questions will be applicable across financial services. Spelling out what ambitious female founders can achieve and demystifying the business of investment are challenges for us all. But many of the reforms that make a real difference will come not from any single initiative, but many small changes. They will take place inside large organisations and small, in major investment committees and in the decisions made by individual angels. 

The value of the Investing in Women Code comes in the end, not from the collection of data alone, but from the focus and reform that follows. Transparency can deliver the changes that female entrepreneurs, and the British economy at large, need to flourish.

License this content